Page 8 - Dyslipidaemia_newsletter8_2024_Final
P. 8

REFLECTIONS
                                                                                                                   Dyslipidaemia
     Dyslipidaemia Global Newsletter #8 2024


     Early identification of high Lp(a) through screening, aggressive
     management of other risk factors, and the emergence of             CLINICAL PEARLS FROM THE FACULTY           Dyslipidaemia
     promising Lp(a)-lowering therapies hold potential for reducing
     the burden of CVD associated with elevated Lp(a).











                                                                           WATCH
                                                                           PROF. SANDIN DISCUSS THE
              CLICK HERE                                                   CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF THIS
              FOR THE LINK TO FULL ARTICLE                                 ARTICLE.




     TREATMENT


     A real-world analysis of adherence, biochemical outcomes, and healthcare costs
     in patients treated with rosuvastatin/ezetimibe as single-pill combination vs. free
     combination in Italy.

     Zambon A, et al. Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Aug 28;4(5):oeae074.

     High LDL-C levels are a primary risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Achieving target LDL-C levels through lipid-lowering therapies
     is crucial in CVD prevention and poor adherence hinders the achievement of LDL-C goals. Combination therapies that include
     ezetimibe with a statin have been shown to be more effective at lowering LDL-C and reaching target levels than increasing statin
     dosage alone.

     In this real-world study examining an administrative database, 25,886 patients on a single-pill combination (SPC) of rosuvastatin and
     ezetimibe, and 7309 patients on free combination treatment (FCT) of the same drugs, were identified and included in the analysis.
     Adherence was calculated as the
     proportion of days covered (PDC)   Graphical abstract
     after cohort balancing by propensity
     score matching. The aim was to
     compare an SPC to a FCT across
     medication adherence, lipid goal
     attainment, and healthcare costs.

     The study found that the SPC
     formulation resulted in significantly
     higher adherence rates, a greater
     likelihood of achieving target LDL
     cholesterol levels, and overall lower
     healthcare expenses compared to
     FCT across all cardiovascular risk
     categories.





          TABLE OF CONTENTS
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13